| WHEN YOU HAVE FINISHED STUDYING THIS CHAPTER, YOU SHOULD
BE ABLE TO:
1. Understand the concept of quality and its importance. 2. Comprehend the philosophy of TQM and its basic principles. 3. Describe the purposes and importance of total quality management 4. Discuss the role of HR in total quality management. 5. Explain the role of HR Department in TQM. |
The increasing competition and the enhanced customer requirements that modern organisations face throughout the world today demand the development and adoption of innovative strategies. Traditional levers of competitive success - product and process technology, protected or regulated markets, easy access to financial resources, and economies of scale -
in our days have become less powerful as sources of competitive advantage. These developments necessitate the adoption of a different mindset for considering issues of management and strategy. Under the pressure of intense international competition, modern organisations of the world are discovering the strong and lasting relationship between quality and profitability and adopt many of the concepts of Total Quality Management [TQM].
'Quality' is a familiar word to us all; however, it has a variety of uses and meanings. In a non-technical qualitative sense may be referred to as 'comparative sense' or 'degree of excellence' [e.g. top quality, high quality, quality performance, quality of communications, etc]. In a quantitative sense, for example in manufacturing, quality is defined in terms of non-conforming parts per hundred [ i.e. some defined degree of imperfection]. Yet, the simplest and most usually adopted definition is the one focusing on adding value to the product/service. In this sense, quality is defined as the attributes of a product and/or service which, as perceived by the customers , make the product/service attractive to them and gives them satisfaction1.
Eight dimensions of quality are identified by pioneers in the field of TQM, such as Deming, Crosby, Juran and Garvin2:
Satisfying customer expectations, and understanding and anticipating their needs , are the crux of TQM, which concerns itself with effective and efficient management, with having totally satisfied customers who come back for more of the same product/service.
An increasing number of CEOs now firmly believe that if quality is right, everything else will follow. Quality is considered of extreme importance, since3:
Total Quality Management is a systematic and coordinated companywide effort to continuously improve the quality of a firm's products and services, so that these products and services meet their customers needs and expectations8. This means that a company following a quality improvement programme changes its operations to focus on the customer, to seek continuous improvements in its operations, to involve employees in decision making in matters affecting them and to empower them to implement these decisions successfully.
TQM 's philosophy, stressing continuous improvement, may be briefly described by stating its seven broad principles/components9:
Traditionally, organisations used to view innovation as having to do only with technology. Nowadays, the concept of innovation has been enlarged to encompass the way organisations do their business. There is much innovation today in the way the companies compete. To meet the challenges of the global economy, successful companies have been eliminating unnecessary layers of management, empowering front-line employees, becoming more responsive to their customers and seeking constantly to improve the products they make, the services they provide and the people they employ. Organisations in the 1990s have no choice but to embrace TQM: either they continually improve quality or they go out of business.
The adoption of TQM philosophy requires a drastic change in the organisational culture of a company: A fundamental change in the way individuals and groups approach their work and their roles in the organisation - that is, from an environment of distrust and fear of reprisal to one of openness and trust, where creativity and flourish; from working as individuals to working as teams; from protection of organisational turfs to the breakdown of departmental barriers; from an autocratic management style of direction and control to a softer style of team leader and coach; from power concentrated at the top to power shared with employees; from a focus on results to a focus on continuous improvement of the processes that deliver the results; and finally, a change from making decisions based on gut-feel to an analytic, fact-based approach to management10. This cultural transformation has significant implications for human resource management, as shown in Tables 3.1 and 3.2.
Table 3.1 "Impact of HRM systems of changing from traditional practices to TQM", Cascio, p. 19
| IMPACT ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OF CHANGING FROM TRADITIONAL PRACTICES TO TQM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source: R. Blackburn & B. Rosen. Total quality and human resources management: Lessons learned from Baldridge Award-winning companies, Academy of Management Executive, 7(3), 1993, 51. |
Table 3.2 "The changed HR practices", Schuler, p. 562
|
THE CHANGED HR PRACTICES
|
||
| SOURCE: Adapted from R. Schuler, "Strategic Human Resource Management: Linking the People with the Strategic Needs of the Business", Organizational Dynamics (New York: AMACOM, Summer 1992): 30. |
The role of the HR Department in improving quality can be considerable. Broadly, it can11:
The HR department can play a significant role in the change process by establishing a specific programme that is responsible for dealing with the change. This programme can involve12:
Additionally, within the HR department there can be further division of roles and responsibilities. This often involves clarifying the relationship between the corporate-level HR department and the business unit - level departments. Taking a proactive stance, the corporate-level department can13:
Don English serves as a corporate vice president at Bancroft enterprises. Don is planning to become the chief executive officer of Bancroft, or some other firm of similar or larger size, within the next five or seven years. He thinks he can achieve this if he remains in Human Resources and does an outstanding job. He will have to be outstanding by all standards, both internal and external to the firm.
During a moment of relection, Don begins to scribble some notes on his desk pad. In the middle is Bancroft. To its left are its suppliers and to its right are its customers. In his head are all the TQM human resource practices that he is so familiar with. Don wonders: How can he help Bancroft experience the excitement of making significant gains in quality improvement? He now seeks your advice in exactly what to do and how to go about doing it.
What would you advice Don? Why?
SOURCE: Randall S. Schuler, New York University.
Click
here to send your answer
| 1. | Juran, J.M. [1988]. Quality Control Handbook. N.Y. : McGraw-Hill |
| 2. | Garvin, D.A. [1991]. ' How the Baldridge Award Really Works', Harvard Business Review, p. 80-95. |
| 3. | Dale, B. and Cooper, C. [1993]. Total Quality and Human Resources. Oxford: Blackwell,pp. 11-14. |
| 4. | Deming, W.E. [1982]. Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. |
| 5. | Buzell, R.D. and Gale, B.T. [1987]. The Profit Impact of Marketing Strategy Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance. N.Y.: Free Press. |
| 6. | Kano, N. , Tanaka, H and Yamaga, Y. [1983]. The TQC Activity of Deming Prize Recipients and its Economic Impact. Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers, Tokyo. |
| 7. | Dale, B. and Cooper, C., op.cit. |
| 8. | Dale and Cooper, ibid, p. 19. Also see, Schuler, R.S. [1995]. Managing Human Resources. Min/St Paul: West Publishing, p. 550. |
| 9. | Cascio, W.F. [1995]. Managing Human Resources. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Inc, p. 18. |
| 10. | Cascio, ibid, p. 18. |
| 11. | Schuler, op.cit, p. 563. |
| 12. | Ibid, p. 563. |
| 13. | Ibid, p. 563 |